AI is not a Technology

Description

ince the release of ChatGPT in November of 2022, researchers, tech executives, and journalists have claimed that society is now in the midst of a technological “revolution.”1 AI, they claim, will soon replace human beings at work2. But these same sources are usually silent as to what, if anything, makes AI a discrete technology. This discrepancy between the big claims concerning supposed labor-replacing technology and the technical vagueness of those material changes, however, is not a minor shortcoming: it is the essence of the phenomenon known as AI, and it has a history.

In the immediate aftermath of the Second World War, executives as the Ford Motor, saddled with a militant union they could not oust from the shop floor, coined a new term: “automation.” Claiming that automation was “a new concept—a new philosophy—of manufacturing,” the word’s substance actually lay in its ideological content3. More than a description of a new technology, “automation” stood in for an argument that all technological progress meant the disempowerment of the industrial proletariat. But while executives claimed that “automation” reduced labor, workers themselves experienced the changes to the workplace as a speed-up and degradation of their working conditions.

AI, this paper argues, is the direct inheritor of the automation discourse. This paper will track the origins of AI as a concept, demonstrate the links between it and the automation discourse of the middle of the twentieth century, and show how the main discursive function of the idea of AI today is, once again, to depict labor degradation as technological progress

Period	21-Mar-2024
Event type	Conference
Conference number	7
Location	Groningen, NetherlandsShow on map
Degree of Recognition	Local