Three modes of spatiotemporal preprocessing by eyes

J.H. van Hateren*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)
    184 Downloads (Pure)


    Optimal spatiotemporal filters for early vision were computed as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and α, a parameter defined as the ratio of the width of the probability distribution of velocities as perceived by the naturally behaving animal, and the characteristic velocity of the photoreceptors (the velocity required to move across a receptor's receptive field in a receptor's integration time). Animals that move slowly, on average, compared with the characteristic velocity of their photoreceptors have α«1, animals that move fast have α»1. For α«1, the temporal part of the optimal filter adapts more to different SNRs (light levels) than the spatial part, leading to large adjustments in temporal resolving power and strong self-inhibition at high SNR, but little lateral inhibition. For α»1, the spatial part of the filter adapts more strongly than the temporal part, leading to strong lateral inhibition at high SNR, and little self-inhibition. For α≈1, both spatial and temporal properties change about equally much when varying SNR. Varying the width of the angular sensitivity of the photoreceptors shows that for every combination of α and SNR there is an optimal width. Visual systems with large α need wider angular sensitivities, in particular at low SNR, in order to reach the information maximum than visual systems with small α.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)583-591
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of comparative physiology a-Sensory neural and behavioral physiology
    Volume 172
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - May-1993


    • Eye design
    • Adaptation
    • Spatiotemporal filtering
    • Natural images

    Cite this