A discussion game for the grounded semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks

Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi; Rineke Verbrugge; Bart Verheij

doi:10.3233/FAIA200527

A discussion game for the grounded semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks

Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Rineke Verbrugge, Bart Verheij

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as formalism for the modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in evaluating of arguments in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. We focus on the grounded semantics of ADFs and provide the grounded discussion game. We show that an argument is acceptable (deniable) in the grounded interpretation of an ADF without any redundant links if and only if the proponent of a claim has a winning strategy in the grounded discussion game.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Editors	H. Prakken
Publisher	IOS Press
Pages	431-442
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Print)	9781643681061
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200527
Publication status	Published - 31-Aug-2020

Publication series

Name	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume	326

Keywords

Abstract argumentation frameworks
Abstract dialectical frameworks
Discussion games

Access to Document

10.3233/FAIA200527Licence: CC BY-NC

A Discussion Game forthe Grounded Semantics of Abstract Dialectical FrameworksFinal publisher's version, 242 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@inbook{dd45517b5ca3485694418d64a02b728c,

title = "A discussion game for the grounded semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks",

abstract = "Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as formalism for the modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in evaluating of arguments in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. We focus on the grounded semantics of ADFs and provide the grounded discussion game. We show that an argument is acceptable (deniable) in the grounded interpretation of an ADF without any redundant links if and only if the proponent of a claim has a winning strategy in the grounded discussion game.",

keywords = "Abstract argumentation frameworks, Abstract dialectical frameworks, Discussion games",

author = "Zafarghandi, {Atefeh Keshavarzi} and Rineke Verbrugge and Bart Verheij",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "31",

doi = "10.3233/FAIA200527",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781643681061",

series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

publisher = "IOS Press",

pages = "431--442",

editor = "H. Prakken",

booktitle = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

}

A discussion game for the grounded semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks. / Zafarghandi, Atefeh Keshavarzi ; Verbrugge, Rineke ; Verheij, Bart.

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. ed. / H. Prakken. IOS Press, 2020. p. 431-442 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 326).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - A discussion game for the grounded semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks

AU - Zafarghandi, Atefeh Keshavarzi

AU - Verbrugge, Rineke

AU - Verheij, Bart

PY - 2020/8/31

Y1 - 2020/8/31

N2 - Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as formalism for the modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in evaluating of arguments in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. We focus on the grounded semantics of ADFs and provide the grounded discussion game. We show that an argument is acceptable (deniable) in the grounded interpretation of an ADF without any redundant links if and only if the proponent of a claim has a winning strategy in the grounded discussion game.

AB - Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as formalism for the modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in evaluating of arguments in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. We focus on the grounded semantics of ADFs and provide the grounded discussion game. We show that an argument is acceptable (deniable) in the grounded interpretation of an ADF without any redundant links if and only if the proponent of a claim has a winning strategy in the grounded discussion game.

KW - Abstract argumentation frameworks

KW - Abstract dialectical frameworks

KW - Discussion games

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7413daf0-19c3-31bf-9c11-0cd314bef38b/

U2 - 10.3233/FAIA200527

DO - 10.3233/FAIA200527

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781643681061

T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

SP - 431

EP - 442

BT - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

A2 - Prakken, H.

PB - IOS Press

ER -