Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as formalism for the modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in evaluating of arguments in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. We focus on the grounded semantics of ADFs and provide the grounded discussion game. We show that an argument is acceptable (deniable) in the grounded interpretation of an ADF without any redundant links if and only if the proponent of a claim has a winning strategy in the grounded discussion game.
|Title of host publication||Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications|
|Number of pages||12|
|Publication status||Published - 31-Aug-2020|
|Name||Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications|
- Abstract argumentation frameworks
- Abstract dialectical frameworks
- Discussion games