Abstract
This paper motivates and studies the feasibility of a new digital right to procedural accuracy (RPA) for digital evidence processing in criminal investigations. The need to guarantee a new principle of procedural accuracy under Art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is based on the concern that digital forensic science and AI technology have a significant impact on individuals’ rights in criminal proceedings, which are neither coherently nor comprehensively addressed. The personal and material scope of RPA are examined and include: (i) protection against unreliable digital evidence processing; (ii) right to access the chain of evidence, explanation, and forensic assistance; and (iii) the right to participate in the determinative stages of the digital evidence processing. Limitations of the RPA are also discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 106040 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Computer Law and Security Review |
| Volume | 55 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov-2024 |
Keywords
- AI-generated evidence
- Criminal procedure
- Digital evidence
- Digital forensics
- Fair trial
- Procedural accuracy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Governance Model for Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver