Abstract
This chapter proposes a solution to the Trolley Problem in terms of the Kantian prohibition on using a person ‘merely as a means.’ A solution of this type seems impossible due to the difficulties it is widely thought to encounter in the scenario known as the Loop case. The chapter offers a conception of ‘using merely as a means’ that explains the morally relevant difference between the classic Bystander and Footbridge cases. It then shows, contrary to the standard view, that a bystander who diverts the trolley in the Loop case need not be using someone ‘merely as a means’ in doing so. This makes it possible to show why the Loop scenario does not undermine the explanation of the salient moral difference between the Bystander and Footbridge cases.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics |
Editors | Mark Timmons |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 204-228 |
Volume | 10 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780198867944, 9780198867951 |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- trolley problem
- Immanuel Kant
- Kantian Ethics
- Judith Jarvis Thomson
- using merely as a means
- practical reasoning