A normative perspective of discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Does it apply to both Ingroup love and outgroup hate?

Vincenzo Iacoviello*, Clara Kulich, Russell Spears

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
112 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research based on the normative perspective on intergroup discrimination showed that participants in the minimal group paradigm (MGP) discriminate because they perceive it to be in line with the ingroup's expectations (Iacoviello & Spears, 2018, 2021). The present set of studies examined whether these normative dynamics are peculiar to ‘ingroup love’, or whether they also apply to ‘outgroup hate’ (Brewer, 1979). Three studies (Ns = 405, 210, 307) first examined norm perceptions and showed that 1) participants perceived outgroup hate to be proscribed by ingroup members less than by an external body (i.e., social scientists), and 2) they perceived ingroup love to be promoted by ingroup members, but proscribed by the external body. Study 3 further showed that both ingroup love and outgroup hate behaviors were dependent on the imagined audience, increasing when participants imagined the presence of the ingroup vs. an external body. Finally, Study 4 (N = 410) showed that both ingroup love and outgroup hate increased when the ingroup norm was pro-discriminatory (vs. anti-discriminatory). The discussion focuses on the relevance of the normative perspective to explain both ingroup love and outgroup hate in the MGP.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104514
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume109
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov-2023

Keywords

  • Ingroup love
  • Minimal group paradigm
  • Norms
  • Outgroup hate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A normative perspective of discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Does it apply to both Ingroup love and outgroup hate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this