A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome

Tone Svilaas; Iwan C. C. van der Horst; Felix Zijlstra

doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.093740

A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome

Tone Svilaas^*, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Felix Zijlstra

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We performed a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the pre-drug-eluting-stent era comparing bare-metal stenting (BMS) with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) to examine coronary angiographic parameters of infarct-related vessel patency and to relate the angiographic measures to clinical outcome. The search was restricted to published RCTs in humans. 10 RCTs, (6192 patients) were analysed. Compared with balloon angioplasty, BMS was associated with reduced rates of reocclusion (6.7% vs 10.1%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.03) and restenosis (23.9% vs 39.3%, OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59, p

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	792-800
Number of pages	9
Journal	Heart
Volume	93
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.093740
Publication status	Published - Jul-2007

Keywords

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS
CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY
THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY
FOLLOW-UP
METAANALYSIS
ARTERY
IMPLANTATION
REOCCLUSION
INTERVENTION
REPERFUSION

Access to Document

10.1136/hrt.2006.093740

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{e6a00a48bcc8486484e82fd4d66dcff4,

title = "A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome",

abstract = "We performed a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the pre-drug-eluting-stent era comparing bare-metal stenting (BMS) with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) to examine coronary angiographic parameters of infarct-related vessel patency and to relate the angiographic measures to clinical outcome. The search was restricted to published RCTs in humans. 10 RCTs, (6192 patients) were analysed. Compared with balloon angioplasty, BMS was associated with reduced rates of reocclusion (6.7% vs 10.1%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.03) and restenosis (23.9% vs 39.3%, OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59, p",

keywords = "RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS, CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY, FOLLOW-UP, METAANALYSIS, ARTERY, IMPLANTATION, REOCCLUSION, INTERVENTION, REPERFUSION",

author = "Tone Svilaas and {van der Horst}, {Iwan C. C.} and Felix Zijlstra",

year = "2007",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1136/hrt.2006.093740",

language = "English",

volume = "93",

pages = "792--800",

journal = "Heart",

issn = "1355-6037",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction

T2 - angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome

AU - Svilaas, Tone

AU - van der Horst, Iwan C. C.

AU - Zijlstra, Felix

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - We performed a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the pre-drug-eluting-stent era comparing bare-metal stenting (BMS) with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) to examine coronary angiographic parameters of infarct-related vessel patency and to relate the angiographic measures to clinical outcome. The search was restricted to published RCTs in humans. 10 RCTs, (6192 patients) were analysed. Compared with balloon angioplasty, BMS was associated with reduced rates of reocclusion (6.7% vs 10.1%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.03) and restenosis (23.9% vs 39.3%, OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59, p

AB - We performed a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the pre-drug-eluting-stent era comparing bare-metal stenting (BMS) with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) to examine coronary angiographic parameters of infarct-related vessel patency and to relate the angiographic measures to clinical outcome. The search was restricted to published RCTs in humans. 10 RCTs, (6192 patients) were analysed. Compared with balloon angioplasty, BMS was associated with reduced rates of reocclusion (6.7% vs 10.1%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.03) and restenosis (23.9% vs 39.3%, OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59, p

KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS

KW - CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY

KW - THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY

KW - FOLLOW-UP

KW - METAANALYSIS

KW - ARTERY

KW - IMPLANTATION

KW - REOCCLUSION

KW - INTERVENTION

KW - REPERFUSION

U2 - 10.1136/hrt.2006.093740

DO - 10.1136/hrt.2006.093740

M3 - Review article

SN - 1355-6037

VL - 93

SP - 792

EP - 800

JO - Heart

JF - Heart

IS - 7

ER -

A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this