A reality check(list) for digital methods

  • Tommaso Venturini*
  • , Liliana Bounegru
  • , Jonathan Gray
  • , Richard Rogers
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Digital Methods can be defined as the repurposing of the inscriptions generated by digital media for the study of collective phenomena. The strength of these methods comes from their capacity to take advantage of the data and computational capacities of online platforms; their weakness comes from the difficulty to separate the phenomena that they investigate from the features of the media in which they manifest ('the medium is the message', according to McLuhan's 1964 dictum). In this article, we discuss various methodological difficulties deriving from the lack of separation between medium and message and propose eight practical precautions to deal with it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4195-4217
Number of pages23
JournalNew media & society
Volume20
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov-2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computational social sciences
  • digital methods
  • digital sociology
  • methodology
  • operationalisation
  • SOCIAL-RESEARCH
  • MEDIA
  • CONTROVERSIES
  • SOCIOLOGY
  • FACEBOOK
  • SCIENCE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A reality check(list) for digital methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this