A Republican and Collective Approach to the Privacy and Surveillance Issues of Bodycams: A commentary

Gerard Ritsema van Eck, Lotte Houwing, Bryce Clayton Newell (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

1 Citation (Scopus)
93 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Body-worn cameras are quickly becoming ubiquitous in public spaces around the world. Whether worn by officers of the law or personnel of a local car parking authority, they present a unique form of surveillance which challenges privacy in public. Governments and other organizations are adopting laws, internal rules, and operational guidelines in a scramble to catch up with the rapid spread of the technology. This fragmented approach to policymaking has so far not provided a panacea to the surrounding privacy issues. In this contribution, we will apply the relatively underexplored theoretical angle of republican political theory and its focus on non-domination to this problem. We argue that taking a republican approach to the value of privacy might be a first step towards addressing some of the concerns raised by the chapters. We focus on two aspects of republican theory: the arbitrariness of interferences, and the closely related notion of freedom as non-domination rather than non-interference. The potential usefulness of the concept of collective privacy in this regard will also be discussed. First, however, we will summarize the preceding chapters which inform this analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPolice on Camera
Subtitle of host publicationSurveillance, Privacy, and Accountability
EditorsBryce Clayton Newell
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter13
Pages223-230
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9780429439759
ISBN (Print)9781138342439
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Publication series

NameRoutledge Studies in Surveillance
PublisherRoutledge
Volume5

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Republican and Collective Approach to the Privacy and Surveillance Issues of Bodycams: A commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this