A Review on the Value of Imaging in Differentiating between Large Vessel Vasculitis and Atherosclerosis

Pieter H. Nienhuis*, Gijs D. van Praagh, Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans, Elisabeth Brouwer, Riemer H. J. A. Slart

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Imaging is becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Atherosclerosis may be difficult to distinguish from LVV on imaging as both are inflammatory conditions of the arterial wall. Differentiating atherosclerosis from LVV is important to enable optimal diagnosis, risk assessment, and tailored treatment at a patient level. This paper reviews the current evidence of ultrasound (US), 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish LVV from atherosclerosis. In this review, we identified a total of eight studies comparing LVV patients to atherosclerosis patients using imaging-four US studies, two FDG-PET studies, and two CT studies. The included studies mostly applied different methodologies and outcome parameters to investigate vessel wall inflammation. This review reports the currently available evidence and provides recommendations on further methodological standardization methods and future directions for research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number236
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of personalized medicine
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar-2021

Keywords

  • large vessel vasculitis
  • atherosclerosis
  • imaging
  • FDG-PET
  • radiological imaging

Cite this