A Stylometric Analysis of Seneca's disputed plays: Authorship Verification of Octavia and Hercules Oetaeus

Paschalis Agapitos*, Andreas van Cranenburgh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Seneca's authorship of Octavia and Hercules Oetaeus is disputed. This study employs established computational stylometry methods based on character n-gram frequencies to investigate this case. Based on a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of stylistic similarities within the Senecan corpus, Octavia and Phoenissae emerge as outliers, while Hercules Oetaeus only stands out when the text is split in half. Subsequently, applying PCA and Bootstrap Consensus Trees (BCT) to a corpus of distractor texts, both disputed plays align with the Senecan cluster/branch. The General Impostors method confidently reports Seneca as the author of the disputed plays under various scenarios. However, upon closer examination of text segments, indications of mixed authorship arise. Based on computational stylometry, it appears that the disputed were in large part, but not wholly, written by Seneca.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-32
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Computational Literary Studies
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14-Nov-2024

Keywords

  • Seneca
  • stylometry
  • authorship verification
  • Latin
  • Stylo

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Stylometric Analysis of Seneca's disputed plays: Authorship Verification of Octavia and Hercules Oetaeus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this