Abstract
Objective: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are widely used for assessing congenital and early-acquired sensorineural hearing toss in young children. Middle ear pathology has a negative effect on the presence of OAEs. In this study we investigated whether measuring OAEs at compensated middle ear pressure (CMEP) resulted in a higher pass rate than at ambient pressure. Secondly, we analysed the influence of 12 different pass definitions on the pass rates.
Methods: One hundred and eleven children (age 1-7 years, mean 4 years and 5 months) were measured twice in one session: first at ambient pressure and then at CMEP
Results: The study showed a higher pass rate of OAEs at CMEP than at ambient pressure. A two-step scenario reduced the number of fails by 18-26%, depending on the pass/fail definition used.
Conclusion: Measuring OAEs at CMEP results in higher pass rates. Secondly, pass/fail definitions have a large influence on pass rates and this issue deserves further attention. Further studies must be done, before this method is readily applicable to universal neonatal screening. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 649-655 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May-2005 |
Keywords
- otoacoustic emission
- middle ear
- pressure
- hearing screening
- OTITIS-MEDIA
- EFFUSION
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A two-step scenario for hearing assessment with otoacoustic emissions at compensated middle ear pressure (in children 1-7 years old)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver