A two-step scenario for hearing assessment with otoacoustic emissions at compensated middle ear pressure (in children 1-7 years old)

  • J.R. Hof*
  • , P van Dijk
  • , M N Chenault
  • , L J C Anteunis
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are widely used for assessing congenital and early-acquired sensorineural hearing toss in young children. Middle ear pathology has a negative effect on the presence of OAEs. In this study we investigated whether measuring OAEs at compensated middle ear pressure (CMEP) resulted in a higher pass rate than at ambient pressure. Secondly, we analysed the influence of 12 different pass definitions on the pass rates.

Methods: One hundred and eleven children (age 1-7 years, mean 4 years and 5 months) were measured twice in one session: first at ambient pressure and then at CMEP

Results: The study showed a higher pass rate of OAEs at CMEP than at ambient pressure. A two-step scenario reduced the number of fails by 18-26%, depending on the pass/fail definition used.

Conclusion: Measuring OAEs at CMEP results in higher pass rates. Secondly, pass/fail definitions have a large influence on pass rates and this issue deserves further attention. Further studies must be done, before this method is readily applicable to universal neonatal screening. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-655
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume69
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May-2005

Keywords

  • otoacoustic emission
  • middle ear
  • pressure
  • hearing screening
  • OTITIS-MEDIA
  • EFFUSION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A two-step scenario for hearing assessment with otoacoustic emissions at compensated middle ear pressure (in children 1-7 years old)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this