Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The URINO trial investigated the effect of offering treatment to older women with urinary incontinence in the general population, who had not sought help on their own initiative.
STUDY DESIGN: In a cluster randomized trial, 14 general practitioners were matched into pairs and randomly allocated to an intervention or a control group. Women aged ≥55 years registered in the participating practices were asked about urinary incontinence via a postal questionnaire. Patients in the intervention group were assessed and treated whereas patients in the control group received standard care.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was improvement (yes or no) of the severity of symptoms at 12-month follow-up measured with the Incontinence Severity Index. Secondary outcomes were the number of incontinence episodes per day and quality of life. The primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis with multiple imputation of missing data. A logistic regression model with correction for cluster randomization was fitted to estimate odds ratios (ORs).
RESULTS: At 12 months, the severity of symptoms had improved in more patients in the intervention group (n166) than in the controls (n184) (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.3). Also, the number of patients with fewer episodes of incontinence had increased (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5-4.1). No between-group differences in changes in quality of life were apparent (p0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended to encourage women in the general population aged ≥55 years with urinary incontinence to undergo diagnosis and treatment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 212-219 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Maturitas |
Volume | 80 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb-2015 |
Keywords
- Urinary incontinence
- Female
- Aged
- General practice
- INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY
- PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
- STRESS-INCONTINENCE
- STANDARDIZATION
- TERMINOLOGY
- MANAGEMENT
- SEVERITY
- QUALITY
- LIFE