TY - JOUR
T1 - Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries
AU - Vlasceanu, Madalina
AU - Doell, Kimberly C.
AU - Bak-Coleman, Joseph B.
AU - Boryana Todorova, Boryana Todorova
AU - Berkebile-Weinberg, Michael M.
AU - Grayson, Samantha J.
AU - Patel, Yash
AU - Goldwert, Danielle
AU - Pei, Yifei
AU - de Azevedo Neto, Flavio
AU - Cohen-Eick, Noa
AU - Lees, Jeffrey
PY - 2024/2/7
Y1 - 2024/2/7
N2 - Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.
AB - Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.
U2 - 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778
DO - 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778
M3 - Article
SN - 2375-2548
VL - 10
JO - Science Advances
JF - Science Advances
IS - 6
M1 - eadj5778
ER -