Abstract
Mixed Treatment Comparisons (MTCs) enable the simultaneous meta-analysis (data pooling) of networks of clinical trials comparing a parts per thousand yen2 alternative treatments. Inconsistency models are critical in MTC to assess the overall consistency between evidence sources. Only in the absence of considerable inconsistency can the results of an MTC (consistency) model be trusted. However, inconsistency model specification is non-trivial when multi-arm trials are present in the evidence structure. In this paper, we define the parameterization problem for inconsistency models in mathematical terms and provide an algorithm for the generation of inconsistency models. We evaluate running-time of the algorithm by generating models for 15 published evidence structures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1099-1111 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Statistics and Computing |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept-2012 |
Keywords
- Mixed treatment comparison
- Network meta-analysis
- Indirect comparisons
- Evidence consistency
- Model generation
- Algorithm
- METAANALYSIS
- NETWORKS
- TRIALS