Allergen immunotherapy for insect venom allergy: protocol for a systematic review

Sangeeta Dhami*, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Eva-Maria Varga, Gunter Sturm, Antonella Muraro, Cezmi A. Akdis, Dario Antolin-Amerigo, M. Beatrice Bilo, Danijela Bokanovic, Moises A. Calderon, Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz, H. N. G. Oude Elberink, Radoslaw Gawlik, Thilo Jakob, Mitja Kosnik, Joanna Lange, Ervin Mingomataj, Dimitris I. Mitsias, Holger Mosbech, Oliver PfaarConstantinos Pitsios, Valerio Pravettoni, Graham Roberts, Franziska Rueeff, Betul Ayse Sin, Aziz Sheikh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
343 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is in the process of developing the EAACI Guidelines for Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for the Management of Insect Venom Allergy. We seek to critically assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of AIT in the management of insect venom allergy.

Methods: We will undertake a systematic review, which will involve searching international biomedical databases for published, in progress and unpublished evidence. Studies will be independently screened against pre-defined eligibility criteria and critically appraised using established instruments. Data will be descriptively and, if possible and appropriate, quantitatively synthesised.

Discussion: The findings from this review will be used to inform the development of recomendations for EAACI's Guidelines on AIT.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6
Number of pages6
JournalClinical and translational allergy
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16-Feb-2016

Keywords

  • Allergy
  • Insect sting
  • Hymenoptera venom allergy
  • Insect venom allergy
  • Allergen immunotherapy
  • Systemic sting reaction
  • HYMENOPTERA VENOM
  • ANAPHYLAXIS
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • MANAGEMENT
  • CHILDREN
  • BIAS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Allergen immunotherapy for insect venom allergy: protocol for a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this