Alternative measures for the global financial cycle: Do they make a difference?

Xin Tian*, Jan P.A.M. Jacobs, Jakob de Haan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

82 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We developed several measures to analyze the global financial cycle employing dynamic factor models and data for 25 advanced and emerging countries spanning 1980 to 2019. These measures were assessed using the similarity and synchronicity metrics proposed by Mink et al. (Oxford Economic Papers 64, 217–236, 2012). The findings indicate a strong similarity and synchronization of global cycles in asset prices and capital flows, particularly evident during crisis episodes. Furthermore, we observe significant co-movement between our financial cycle measures and two literature-based measures that utilize top-down and bottom-up approaches. However, the VIX index shows a lower level of co-movement with our global financial cycle measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4483-4498
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Finance and Economics
Volume29
Issue number4
Early online date13-Sept-2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct-2024

Keywords

  • asset prices
  • capital flows
  • dynamic factor analysis
  • global financial cycle
  • national financial cycle
  • VIX

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative measures for the global financial cycle: Do they make a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this