An in vitro Study to determine the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine and herbal mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis

  • N. Nagappan*
  • , M. Mohamed Ejaj
  • , Thomson Mariadasan D'Cruz
  • , Gireesh Kumar Subbiah
  • , Tajuddin Rameezuddin
  • , Krithika Subbiah
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    135 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control. Aim: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against Enterococcus faecalis. Methodology: The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method. Results: The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse. Conclusion: The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)S995-S999
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
    Volume14
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul-2022

    Keywords

    • Antimicrobial efficacy
    • chlorhexidine
    • Enterococcus faecalis
    • herbal

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An in vitro Study to determine the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine and herbal mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this