TY - JOUR
T1 - An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases
AU - Husseini, Jad S.
AU - Amorim, Barbara Juarez
AU - Torrado-Carvajal, Angel
AU - Prabhu, Vinay
AU - Groshar, David
AU - Umutlu, Lale
AU - Herrmann, Ken
AU - Canamaque, Lina Garcia
AU - Garzon, Jose Ramon Garcia
AU - Palmer, William E.
AU - Heidari, Pedram
AU - Shih, Tiffany Ting-Fang
AU - Sosna, Jacob
AU - Matushita, Cristina
AU - Cerci, Juliano
AU - Queiroz, Marcelo
AU - Muglia, Valdair Francisco
AU - Nogueira-Barbosa, Marcello H.
AU - Borra, Ronald J. H.
AU - Kwee, Thomas C.
AU - Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
AU - Evangelista, Laura
AU - Salvatore, Marco
AU - Cuocolo, Alberto
AU - Soricelli, Andrea
AU - Herold, Christian
AU - Laghi, Andrea
AU - Mayerhoefer, Marius
AU - Mahmood, Umar
AU - Catana, Ciprian
AU - Daldrup-Link, Heike E.
AU - Rosen, Bruce
AU - Catalano, Onofrio A.
PY - 2021/2/22
Y1 - 2021/2/22
N2 - Background MR is an important imaging modality for evaluating musculoskeletal malignancies owing to its high soft tissue contrast and its ability to acquire multiparametric information. PET provides quantitative molecular and physiologic information and is a critical tool in the diagnosis and staging of several malignancies. PET/MR, which can take advantage of its constituent modalities, is uniquely suited for evaluating skeletal metastases. We reviewed the current evidence of PET/MR in assessing for skeletal metastases and provided recommendations for its use. Methods We searched for the peer reviewed literature related to the usage of PET/MR in the settings of osseous metastases. In addition, expert opinions, practices, and protocols of major research institutions performing research on PET/MR of skeletal metastases were considered. Results Peer-reviewed published literature was included. Nuclear medicine and radiology experts, including those from 13 major PET/MR centers, shared the gained expertise on PET/MR use for evaluating skeletal metastases and contributed to a consensus expert opinion statement. [18F]-FDG and non [18F]-FDG PET/MR may provide key advantages over PET/CT in the evaluation for osseous metastases in several primary malignancies. Conclusion PET/MR should be considered for staging of malignancies where there is a high likelihood of osseous metastatic disease based on the characteristics of the primary malignancy, hight clinical suspicious and in case, where the presence of osseous metastases will have an impact on patient management. Appropriate choice of tumor-specific radiopharmaceuticals, as well as stringent adherence to PET and MR protocols, should be employed.
AB - Background MR is an important imaging modality for evaluating musculoskeletal malignancies owing to its high soft tissue contrast and its ability to acquire multiparametric information. PET provides quantitative molecular and physiologic information and is a critical tool in the diagnosis and staging of several malignancies. PET/MR, which can take advantage of its constituent modalities, is uniquely suited for evaluating skeletal metastases. We reviewed the current evidence of PET/MR in assessing for skeletal metastases and provided recommendations for its use. Methods We searched for the peer reviewed literature related to the usage of PET/MR in the settings of osseous metastases. In addition, expert opinions, practices, and protocols of major research institutions performing research on PET/MR of skeletal metastases were considered. Results Peer-reviewed published literature was included. Nuclear medicine and radiology experts, including those from 13 major PET/MR centers, shared the gained expertise on PET/MR use for evaluating skeletal metastases and contributed to a consensus expert opinion statement. [18F]-FDG and non [18F]-FDG PET/MR may provide key advantages over PET/CT in the evaluation for osseous metastases in several primary malignancies. Conclusion PET/MR should be considered for staging of malignancies where there is a high likelihood of osseous metastatic disease based on the characteristics of the primary malignancy, hight clinical suspicious and in case, where the presence of osseous metastases will have an impact on patient management. Appropriate choice of tumor-specific radiopharmaceuticals, as well as stringent adherence to PET and MR protocols, should be employed.
KW - Skeletal
KW - Osseous
KW - Metastases
KW - PET
KW - MR
KW - MRI
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-021-05198-2
DO - 10.1007/s00259-021-05198-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 33619599
SN - 1619-7070
JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
ER -