Abstract
Introduction: Recurrent bleeding from an upper gastrointestinal ulcer when endoscopy fails is a reason for radiological or surgical treatment, both of which have their advantages and disadvantages.
Case: Based on a patient with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, we reviewed the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment and embolisation, respectively.
Discussion: Transarterial embolisation (TAE) and surgical treatment are both options for recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding when endoscopy fails. Both therapies have serious complications and a risk of rebleeding. Choosing the therapy depends on the capability of the patient to tolerate haemodynamic instability, resuscitation and hypotension.
Conclusion: Choosing between TAE and surgery depends a great deal on the case presented, haemodynamic stability and the skills and tools available at that moment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 355-358 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | The Netherlands Journal of Medicine |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 7 |
Publication status | Published - Sept-2013 |
Keywords
- Gastrointestinal bleeding
- failed endoscopy
- TAE
- surgery
- TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION
- PEPTIC-ULCER
- CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS
- THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY
- SURGERY
- MANAGEMENT
- MORTALITY
- FAILURE
- TRIAL