Antiepileptic drug prescribing before, during and after pregnancy: a study in seven European regions

Rachel Charlton, Ester Garne, Hao Wang, Kari Klungsøyr, Sue Jordan, Amanda Neville, Anna Pierini, Anne Hansen, Anders Engeland, Rosa Gini, Daniel Thayer, Jens Bos, Aurora Puccini, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Helen Dolk, Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)
    21 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore antiepileptic drug (AED) prescribing before, during and after pregnancy as recorded in seven population-based electronic healthcare databases.

    METHODS: Databases in Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Italy (Emilia Romagna/Tuscany), Wales and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, representing the rest of the UK, were accessed for the study. Women with a pregnancy starting and ending between 2004 and 2010, which ended in a delivery, were identified. AED prescriptions issued (UK) or dispensed (non-UK) at any time during pregnancy and the 6 months before and after pregnancy were identified in each of the databases. AED prescribing patterns were analysed, and the choice of AEDs and co-prescribing of folic acid were evaluated.

    RESULTS: In total, 978 957 women with 1 248 713 deliveries were identified. In all regions, AED prescribing declined during pregnancy and was lowest during the third trimester, before returning to pre-pregnancy levels by 6 months following delivery. For all deliveries, the prevalence of AED prescribing during pregnancy was 51 per 10 000 pregnancies (CI95 49-52%) and was lowest in the Netherlands (43/10 000; CI95 33-54%) and highest in Wales (60/10 000; CI95 54-66%). In Denmark, Norway and the two UK databases lamotrigine was the most commonly prescribed AED; whereas in the Italian and Dutch databases, carbamazepine, valproate and phenobarbital were most frequently prescribed. Few women prescribed with AEDs in the 3 months before pregnancy were co-prescribed with high-dose folic acid: ranging from 1.0% (CI95 0.3-1.8%) in Emilia Romagna to 33.5% (CI95 28.7-38.4%) in Wales.

    CONCLUSION: The country's differences in prescribing patterns may suggest different use, knowledge or interpretation of the scientific evidence base. The low co-prescribing of folic acid indicates that more needs to be done to better inform clinicians and women of childbearing age taking AEDs about the need to offer and receive complete preconception care. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1144-1154
    Number of pages11
    JournalPharmcoepidemiology and Drug Safety
    Volume34
    Issue number11
    Early online date13-Aug-2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov-2015

    Keywords

    • anticonvulsants
    • pregnancy
    • drug utilisation
    • electronic health records
    • pharmacoepidemiology
    • CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS
    • BIRTH-DEFECTS
    • UK-EPILEPSY
    • EXPOSURE
    • WOMEN
    • REGISTER
    • OUTCOMES
    • COUNTRIES
    • PATTERNS
    • DATABASE

    Cite this