Abstract
Some disagreements seem to be persistent: they are, pretty much, immune to persuasive argumentation. If that is the case: how to overcome them? Can argumentation help us? I will propose that, to overcome persistent disagreements through argumentation, we need a dynamic and pluralistic version of argumentation. Therefore, I will propose that argumentation, more than a tool that uses persuasion to change the mind of the counterpart, is a toolbox that uses persuasion, deliberation, negotiation and other dialogical strategies to reach an agreement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 245–280 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Informal logic |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 6-Jul-2021 |