Argumentation schemes from Hamblin's dialectical perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
154 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper aims at a normative account of non-deductive argumentation schemes in the spirit of Hamblin's dialectical philosophy. First, three principles are presented that characterize Hamblin's dialectical stance. Second, argumentation schemes, which have hardly been examined in Hamblin's book Fallacies, shall be dealt with by applying these principles, taking an argumentation scheme from authority as the leading example. Third, a formal dialectical system, along the lines indicated by Hamblin, shall be developed that includes norms for using argumentation schemes and norms for responding to arguments that are presented as instantiating acceptable argumentation schemes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-366
Number of pages23
JournalInformal logic
Volume31
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • argumentation scheme
  • connection premise
  • counterconsideration
  • criticism
  • dialectic
  • expert opinion
  • formal dialectic
  • Hamblin
  • premise
  • presumption
  • scheme

Cite this