Abstract
This article is divided into three substantive sections. Section I delineates Aristotle’s theory of the soul as laid out in De Anima. Section II defines habeas corpus as a legal concept and demonstrates under what circumstances it should be granted. Section III applies Aristotle’s theory of the soul as a structure whereby animals could be granted habeas corpus rights.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | University of San Francisco Law Review |
Volume | 55 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 26-May-2022 |
Keywords
- animal rights
- animal law
- comparative law
- philosophy of law
- ethics
- law
- legal philosophy
- jurisprudence
- history of law
- Aristotelian commentators
- Aristotle
- Ancient Greek
- Ancient Greek Philosophy
- Philosophy
- The Great Books
- Great Books
- De Anima
- Theory of Law
- Social
- Sociology
- Social law
- Aquinas
- St. Thomas Aquinas
- Latin
- Supreme Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Spain
- Spanish law
- Apes
- Rights issues
- Rights
- great apes
- Great Ape Project
- Habeas Corpus
- Criminal law
- crime
- Constitutional rights
- Constitution
- Bill of Rights
- soul
- Aristotelean soul
- Aristotle's soul
- De anima
- On the soul
- Aristotle on the soul
- Natural Law
- Roe v. Wade
- abortion
- abortion rights
- abortion law
- American law
- american jurispdruence
- comparative jurisprudence
- rational
- locomotive
- nutritive
- animal law commons
- law and philosophy
- law and politics
- law and society
- society and law
- deduction
- induction
- syllogism
- Nussabaum
- Great Chain of Being
- Evolution
- Darwin
- King Albert
- Charles Darwin
- Yale Law
- Harvard Law
- Stanford Law