Assessing the Impact on Health of Pharmacovigilance Activities: Example of Four Safety Signals

Introduction: The impact of pharmacovigilance activities on public health remains under-investigated, and measuring the impact on health of pharmacovigilance activities for a specific safety signal is challenging. Objective: To gain more insight into the methodological challenges and the data required, we assessed the impact of pharmacovigilance on public health for four identified product-specific safety signals using publicly available data in the Netherlands. The assessment was on the impact of the intertwined and complementary steps of the pharmacovigilance pathways. Methods: The impact of pharmacovigilance on public health was assessed using the assessment support tool and ‘open data’ from the Netherlands for four different types of pharmacovigilance safety signals: (1) off-label use of cyproterone acetate/ethinyloestradiol (CPA/EE) and thrombotic risk after pharmacovigilance measures after 2014; (2) pergolide and the risk of cardiac valvulopathy after pharmacovigilance activities in 2003; (3) proton pump inhibitors and the risk of hypomagnesaemia after pharmacovigilance activities in 2011; (4) rosiglitazone withdrawal from the market because of cardiovascular effects in 2010. Results: For the signals on CPA/EE and pergolide, a crude estimation of the impact could be made with varying degrees of assumptions based on the risk described in the literature and utilisation data. Conclusion: This article highlights the methodological challenges and the data required to assess the impact of product-specific safety signals. A structured assessment support tool can be used as a guide for the necessary data elements and steps needed for the measurement or estimation of impact of pharmacovigilance activities on public health, provided that the appropriate data are available.