Beliefs About the Malleability of Immoral Groups Facilitate Collective Action

Smadar Cohen-Chen*, Eran Halperin, Tamar Saguy, Martijn van Zomeren

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although negative out-group beliefs typically foster individuals' motivation for collective action, we propose that such beliefs may diminish this motivation when people believe that this out-group cannot change in its very essence. Specifically, we tested the idea that believing in the malleability of immoral out-groups (i.e., targets of collective action) should increase collective action tendencies through group efficacy beliefs. Study 1 revealed that the more strongly participants believed that immoral out-groups could change as a function of contextual influences, the stronger their collective action tendencies were due to increased group efficacy. In Study 2, we experimentally replicated these findings using a manipulation of individuals' beliefs about immoral out-groups being potentially malleable (vs. fixed). We discuss implications of our findings with an eye on the literature on collective action and implicit beliefs and on the promotion of civic engagement more broadly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-210
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar-2014

Keywords

  • collective action
  • social change
  • group efficacy
  • implicit theories
  • IMPLICIT THEORIES
  • INTERGROUP CONTACT
  • DISADVANTAGED GROUP
  • CHANGING BELIEFS
  • SOCIAL IDENTITY
  • PARTICIPATION
  • STRATEGIES
  • EFFICACY
  • IDENTIFICATION
  • PERSPECTIVES

Cite this