Beta-blocker use and outcomes in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction

  • Shingo Matsumoto
  • , Alasdair D. Henderson
  • , Li Shen
  • , Toru Kondo
  • , Mingming Yang
  • , Ross T. Campbell
  • , Inder S. Anand
  • , Rudolf A. de Boer
  • , Akshay S. Desai
  • , Carolyn S.P. Lam
  • , Aldo P. Maggioni
  • , Felipe A. Martinez
  • , Milton Packer
  • , Margaret M. Redfield
  • , Jean L. Rouleau
  • , Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen
  • , Muthiah Vaduganathan
  • , Faiez Zannad
  • , Michael R. Zile
  • , Pardeep S. Jhund
  • Scott D. Solomon, John J.V. McMurray*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: In the absence of randomized trial evidence, we performed a large observational analysis of the association between beta-blocker (BB) use and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Methods and results: We pooled individual patient data from four large HFmrEF/HFpEF trials (I-Preserve, TOPCAT, PARAGON-HF, and DELIVER). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Among the 16 951 patients included, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.8%, and 13 400 (79.1%) had HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). Overall, 12 812 patients (75.6%) received a BB. The median bisoprolol-equivalent dose of BB was 5.0 (Q1–Q3: 2.5–5.0) mg with BB continuation rates of 93.1% at 2 years (in survivors). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome did not differ between BB users and non-users (HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.05), but the adjusted HR was lower in BB users than non-users (0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.88), and this association was maintained across LVEF (pinteraction = 0.88). In subgroup analyses, the adjusted risk of the primary outcome was similar in BB users and non-users with or without a history of myocardial infarction, hypertension, or a baseline heart rate <70 bpm. By contrast, a better outcome with BB use was seen in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those without atrial fibrillation (pintreraction = 0.02).
Conclusions: In this observational analysis of non-randomized BB treatment, there was no suggestion that BB use was associated with worse HF outcomes in HFmrEF/HFpEF, even after extensive adjustment for other prognostic variables.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-139
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2025

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Beta-blocker
  • Heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction
  • Heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beta-blocker use and outcomes in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this