TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomarkers in the era of targeted therapy in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica
T2 - is it possible to replace acute-phase reactants?
AU - Carvajal Alegria, Guillermo
AU - Nicolas, Mathilde
AU - van Sleen, Yannick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Carvajal Alegria, Nicolas and van Sleen.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Research into giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) has become more important in the last few decades. Physicians are facing several challenges in managing the diagnosis, treatment, and relapses of GCA and PMR patients. The search for biomarkers could provide elements to guide a physician’s decision. In this review, we aim to summarize the scientific publications about biomarkers in GCA and PMR in the past decade. The first point raised by this review is the number of clinical situations in which biomarkers could be useful: differential diagnosis of either GCA or PMR, diagnosis of underlying vasculitis in PMR, prediction of relapse or complications, disease activity monitoring, choice, and modification of treatments. The second point raised by this review is the large number of biomarkers studied, from common markers like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or elements of blood count to inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, or immune cell subpopulations. Finally, this review underlines the heterogeneity between the studies and proposes points to consider in studies evaluating biomarkers in general and particularly in the case of GCA and PMR.
AB - Research into giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) has become more important in the last few decades. Physicians are facing several challenges in managing the diagnosis, treatment, and relapses of GCA and PMR patients. The search for biomarkers could provide elements to guide a physician’s decision. In this review, we aim to summarize the scientific publications about biomarkers in GCA and PMR in the past decade. The first point raised by this review is the number of clinical situations in which biomarkers could be useful: differential diagnosis of either GCA or PMR, diagnosis of underlying vasculitis in PMR, prediction of relapse or complications, disease activity monitoring, choice, and modification of treatments. The second point raised by this review is the large number of biomarkers studied, from common markers like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or elements of blood count to inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, or immune cell subpopulations. Finally, this review underlines the heterogeneity between the studies and proposes points to consider in studies evaluating biomarkers in general and particularly in the case of GCA and PMR.
KW - biomarker
KW - disease activity monitoring
KW - giant cell arteritis
KW - polymyalgia rheumatica
KW - targeted therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163769583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202160
DO - 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202160
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37398679
AN - SCOPUS:85163769583
SN - 1664-3224
VL - 14
JO - Frontiers in Immunology
JF - Frontiers in Immunology
M1 - 1202160
ER -