Both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy may favorably affect outcome in patients with advanced heart failure. A retrospective analysis of the PRIME-II trial

Introduction: Current guidelines of chronic heart failure (CHF) do not recommend the use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) or antiptatelet therapy (APT). We performed a post-hoc analysis to evaluate the effect of the use of anti-thrombotic therapy with APT and OAC.

Patients and methods: We examined 427 patients with advanced CHF, and assessed the effects of the use of APT or OAC at baseline on mortality. We employed a Cox-proportional hazard model to value the effects of APT or OAC use.

Results: After a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (range 2.0-5.4), 214 patients died (51%). Forty-one (41) percent (95%CI: 29-53%) of the patients on APT died, and 52% (47-57%) of the patients not on APT (P=0.07). Forty-eight (48) percent (42-54%) of the patients on OAC died, and 55% (46-63%) of the patients not on OAC (P=0.20). This effect of OAC was seen both in patients in sinus rhythm and in atria[ fibrillation. After adjusting for important prognostic variables, such as age, LVEF, renal function, and NYHA class, both the use of APT (hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.97; P=0.04) and the use of OAC (HR 0.60, 95%-CI 0.43-0.83; P <0.01) were related to an improved prognosis.

Conclusion: This post-hoc analysis suggests that in CHF patients the use of APT or OAC is associated with a higher survival. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.