Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment of Patients With Severe Heterogeneous Emphysema

Dirk-Jan Slebos*, Karin Klooster, Armin Ernst, Felix J. F. Herth, Huib A. M. Kerstjens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

161 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The lung volume reduction coil (LVR-coil), a new experimental device to achieve lung volume reduction by bronchoscopy in patients with severe emphysema, works in a manner unaffected by collateral airflow. We investigated the safety and efficacy of LVR-coil treatment in patients with heterogeneous emphysema.

Methods: In this prospective cohort pilot study, patients were treated bronchoscopically with Nitinol LVR-coils under fluoroscopic guidance in either one procedure or two sequential procedures. Follow-up tests included the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), pulmonary function testing, and the 6-min walk test (6MWT).

Results: Twenty-eight LVR-coil procedures were performed in 16 patients (baseline FEV1, 28% [+/- 7.6%] predicted). Four patients were treated in one lung, and 12 patients were treated in both lungs. A median of 10 (5-12) coils was placed per lung in 36.5 (20-60) min. Adverse events (AEs) rated as possibly related to either the device or the procedure <30 days after treatment were pneumothorax (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 2), COPD exacerbation (n = 6), chest pain (n = 4), and mild (<5 mL) hemoptysis (n = 21). From 30 days to 6 months, the AEs that occurred were pneumonia (n = 3) and COPD exacerbation (n = 14). All events resolved with standard care. Six months after LVR-coil treatment, there were significant improvements in SGRQ (-14.9 points [+/- 12.1 points, with 11 patients improving by > 4 points]), FEV1 (+14.9% +/- 17.0%), FVC (+13.4% +/- 12.9%), residual volume (-11.4% +/- 9.0%), and 6MWT (+84.4 +/- 73.4 m), all P <.005.

Conclusions: LVR-coil treatment is a promising technique for the treatment of patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema. The treatment is technically feasible and results in significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life, with an acceptable safety profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-582
Number of pages9
JournalChest
Volume142
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep-2012

Keywords

  • OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE
  • MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE
  • DYNAMIC HYPERINFLATION
  • COLLATERAL VENTILATION
  • EXERCISE
  • THERAPY
  • SURGERY
  • DENSITOMETRY
  • FEASIBILITY
  • LIMITATION

Cite this