Building enforcement capacity: Evidence from the Mexican civil service reform

Fernando Nieto Morales, Liesbet Heyse, María del Carmen Pardo, Rafael Wittek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
159 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Building enforcement capacity, that is, attaining and sustaining control in order to implement changes, is crucial for the success of public management reforms. However, this aspect of public management reform does not receive much theoretical or empirical attention. This paper analyzes the process of building enforcement capacity for the case of the Mexican Professional Civil Service reform. Although this reform experienced several complications (e.g., limited support, resources, and credibility), important goals were attained and some control was achieved. We study how officials attained control over implementation through the adaptive management of combinations of different types of control strategies (regulatory, normative, and procedural). The case study, focused on the analysis of in-depth interviews with the highest officials involved in the implementation of this reform, finds evidence for three combinations of strategies next to a general pattern characterized by a trade-off between compliance and coordination. This trade-off shows that the process of building enforcement capacity may affect the goals of the reform, deviating from lawmakers' original intentions Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-405
Number of pages17
JournalPublic administration and development
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2014

Keywords

  • administrative reform
  • civil service reform
  • enforcement capacity
  • implementation
  • Mexico
  • PUBLIC-SECTOR
  • POLICY
  • ORGANIZATIONS
  • LEGITIMACY
  • DESIGN
  • FIELDS
  • MYTH

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Building enforcement capacity: Evidence from the Mexican civil service reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this