11 Citations (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Because of the limited axial field of view of conventional PET scanners, the internal carotid arteries are commonly used to obtain an imagederived input function (IDIF) in quantitative brain PET. However, time- activity curves extracted from the internal carotids are prone to partialvolume effects due to the limited PET resolution. This study aimed to assess the use of the internal carotids for quantifying brain glucose metabolism before and after partial-volume correction. Methods: Dynamic [18F]FDG images were acquired on a 106-cm-long PET scanner, and quantification was performed with a 2-tissue-compartment model and Patlak analysis using an IDIF extracted from the internal carotids. An IDIF extracted from the ascending aorta was used as ground truth. Results: The internal carotid IDIF underestimated the area under the curve by 37% compared with the ascending aorta IDIF, leading to Ki values approximately 17% higher. After partial-volume correction, the mean relative Ki differences calculated with the ascending aorta and internal carotid IDIFs dropped to 7.5% and 0.05%, when using a 2-tissue-compartment model and Patlak analysis, respectively. However, microparameters (K1, k2, k3) derived from the corrected internal carotid curve differed significantly from those obtained using the ascending aorta. Conclusion: These results suggest that partial-volume-corrected internal carotids may be used to estimate Ki but not kinetic microparameters. Further validation in a larger patient cohort with more variable kinetics is needed for more definitive conclusions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-606
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Apr-2024

Keywords

  • cerebral glucose consumption
  • image-derived input function
  • kinetic modeling
  • partial-volume correction
  • PET

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can Internal Carotid Arteries Be Used for Noninvasive Quantification of Brain PET Studies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this