TY - JOUR
T1 - Caries preventive measures in orthodontic practice
T2 - The development of a clinical practice guideline
AU - Oosterkamp, B. C.M.
AU - Frencken, J. E.F.M.
AU - Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Objectives: White spot lesions (WSLs) are a side effect of orthodontic treatment, causing esthetic problems and a risk of deeper enamel and dentine lesions. Many strategies have been developed for preventing WSLs, but great variability exists in preventive measures between orthodontists. This study developed statements on which a clinical practice guideline (CPG) can be developed in order to help orthodontists select preventive measures based on the best available evidence. Materials and methods: A nominal group technique (RAND-e modified Delphi procedure) was used. A multidisciplinary expert panel rated 264 practice- and evidence-based statements related to the management of WSLs. To provide panel members with the same knowledge, a total of six articles obtained from a systematic review of the literature were read by the panel in preparation of three consensus rounds. According to the technique, a threshold of 75% of all ratings within any 3-point section of the 9-point scale regarding a specific statement was accepted as consensus. Results: After the first and second consensus rounds, consensus was reached on 37.5 and 31.1% of statements, respectively. For the remaining 31.4% of statements, consensus was reached during a 4-h consensus meeting. Conclusions: Statements on the management of WSLs derived from a systematic literature review combined with expert opinion were formally integrated toward consensus through a nominal group technique. These statements formed the basis for developing a CPG on the management of WSLs before and during orthodontic treatment.
AB - Objectives: White spot lesions (WSLs) are a side effect of orthodontic treatment, causing esthetic problems and a risk of deeper enamel and dentine lesions. Many strategies have been developed for preventing WSLs, but great variability exists in preventive measures between orthodontists. This study developed statements on which a clinical practice guideline (CPG) can be developed in order to help orthodontists select preventive measures based on the best available evidence. Materials and methods: A nominal group technique (RAND-e modified Delphi procedure) was used. A multidisciplinary expert panel rated 264 practice- and evidence-based statements related to the management of WSLs. To provide panel members with the same knowledge, a total of six articles obtained from a systematic review of the literature were read by the panel in preparation of three consensus rounds. According to the technique, a threshold of 75% of all ratings within any 3-point section of the 9-point scale regarding a specific statement was accepted as consensus. Results: After the first and second consensus rounds, consensus was reached on 37.5 and 31.1% of statements, respectively. For the remaining 31.4% of statements, consensus was reached during a 4-h consensus meeting. Conclusions: Statements on the management of WSLs derived from a systematic literature review combined with expert opinion were formally integrated toward consensus through a nominal group technique. These statements formed the basis for developing a CPG on the management of WSLs before and during orthodontic treatment.
KW - Delphi
KW - Evidence-based practice
KW - Orthodontics
KW - Preventive measures
KW - Tooth demineralization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84954360342
U2 - 10.1111/ocr.12107
DO - 10.1111/ocr.12107
M3 - Article
C2 - 26450013
AN - SCOPUS:84954360342
SN - 1601-6335
VL - 19
SP - 36
EP - 45
JO - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
JF - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
IS - 1
ER -