Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the General Court

Lorenzo Squintani

doi:10.1163/18760104-01502005

Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the General Court

Lorenzo Squintani^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

527 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This case concerns an appeal by Binca Seafoods GmbH against the judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2016 in case T-94/15, in which the General Court rejected the request of annulment by Binca Seafoods against Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1358/2014 amending Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007, as regards the origin of organic aquaculture animals, aquaculture husbandry practices, feed for organic aquaculture animals and products and substances allowed for use in organic aquaculture. According to the General Court, Binca Seafoods did not have an interest to proceed. The Court of Justice clearly has a different meaning.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	219-239
Number of pages	21
Journal	Journal For European Environmental & Planning Law
Volume	15
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01502005
Publication status	Published - 2018

Access to Document

10.1163/18760104-01502005Licence: CC BY-NC

Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the General CourtFinal publisher's version, 329 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{bcffdca40a9e4c35939a33b52d37a4dd,

title = "Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the General Court",

abstract = "This case concerns an appeal by Binca Seafoods GmbH against the judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2016 in case T-94/15, in which the General Court rejected the request of annulment by Binca Seafoods against Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1358/2014 amending Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007, as regards the origin of organic aquaculture animals, aquaculture husbandry practices, feed for organic aquaculture animals and products and substances allowed for use in organic aquaculture. According to the General Court, Binca Seafoods did not have an interest to proceed. The Court of Justice clearly has a different meaning.",

author = "Lorenzo Squintani",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1163/18760104-01502005",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "219--239",

journal = "Journal For European Environmental & Planning Law",

issn = "1613-7272",

publisher = "BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the General Court

AU - Squintani, Lorenzo

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This case concerns an appeal by Binca Seafoods GmbH against the judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2016 in case T-94/15, in which the General Court rejected the request of annulment by Binca Seafoods against Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1358/2014 amending Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007, as regards the origin of organic aquaculture animals, aquaculture husbandry practices, feed for organic aquaculture animals and products and substances allowed for use in organic aquaculture. According to the General Court, Binca Seafoods did not have an interest to proceed. The Court of Justice clearly has a different meaning.

AB - This case concerns an appeal by Binca Seafoods GmbH against the judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2016 in case T-94/15, in which the General Court rejected the request of annulment by Binca Seafoods against Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1358/2014 amending Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007, as regards the origin of organic aquaculture animals, aquaculture husbandry practices, feed for organic aquaculture animals and products and substances allowed for use in organic aquaculture. According to the General Court, Binca Seafoods did not have an interest to proceed. The Court of Justice clearly has a different meaning.

U2 - 10.1163/18760104-01502005

DO - 10.1163/18760104-01502005

M3 - Article

SN - 1613-7272

VL - 15

SP - 219

EP - 239

JO - Journal For European Environmental & Planning Law

JF - Journal For European Environmental & Planning Law

IS - 2

ER -

Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the General Court

Abstract

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this