Central radiology assessment of the randomized phase III open-label OVHIPEC-1 trial in ovarian cancer

Simone N. Koole, Leigh Bruijs, Cristina Fabris, Karolina Sikorska, Maurits Engbersen, Jules H. Schagen van Leeuwen, Henk W. R. Schreuder, Ralph H. Hermans, Jacobus van der Velden, Henriette J. G. Arts, Maaike van Ham, Peter Van Dam, Peter Vuylsteke, Max Lahaye, Gabe Sonke, Willemien van Driel*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    145 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Introduction

    Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improved investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival and overall survival in patients with stage III ovarian cancer in the phase III OVHIPEC-1 trial. We analyzed whether an open-label design affected the results of the trial by central blinded assessment of recurrence-free survival, and tested whether HIPEC specifically targets the peritoneal surface by analyzing the site of disease recurrence.

    Methods

    OVHIPEC-1 was an open-label, multicenter, phase III trial that randomized 245 patients after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval cytoreduction with or without HIPEC using cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)). Patients received three additional cycles of chemotherapy after surgery. Computed tomography (CT) scans and serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) measurements were performed during chemotherapy, and during follow-up. Two expert radiologists reviewed all available CT scans. They were blinded for treatment allocation and clinical outcome. Central revision included Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 measurements and peritoneal cancer index scorings at baseline, during treatment, and during follow-up. Time to centrally-revised recurrence was compared between study arms using Cox proportional hazard models. Subdistribution models compared time to peritoneal recurrence between arms, accounting for competing risks.

    Results

    CT scans for central revision were available for 231 patients (94%) during neoadjuvant treatment and 212 patients (87%) during follow-up. Centrally-assessed median recurrence-free survival was 9.9 months in the surgery group and 13.2 months in the surgery+HIPEC group (HR for disease recurrence or death 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94; p=0.015). The improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival associated with HIPEC were irrespective of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and baseline peritoneal cancer index. Cumulative incidence of peritoneal recurrence was lower after surgery+HIPEC, but there was no difference in extraperitoneal recurrences.

    Conclusion

    Centrally-assessed recurrence-free survival analysis confirms the benefit of adding HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with stage III ovarian cancer, with fewer peritoneal recurrences. These results rule out radiological bias caused by the open-label nature of the study.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1928-1934
    Number of pages7
    JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
    Volume30
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec-2020

    Keywords

    • ovarian cancer
    • HYPERTHERMIC INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY
    • LONG-TERM SURVIVAL
    • NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
    • GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY
    • CARCINOMA

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Central radiology assessment of the randomized phase III open-label OVHIPEC-1 trial in ovarian cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this