Changes in propulsion technique and shoulder complex loading following low-intensity wheelchair practice in novices

Marika T Leving, Riemer J K Vegter, Wiebe H K de Vries, Sonja de Groot, Lucas H V van der Woude

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
338 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

Up to 80% of wheelchair users are affected by shoulder pain. The Clinical Practice Guide- lines for preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury suggest that using a proper wheelchair propulsion technique could minimize the shoulder injury risk. Yet, the exact relationship between the wheelchair propulsion technique and shoulder load is not well understood.

Objective

This study aimed to examine the changes in shoulder loading accompanying the typical changes in propulsion technique following 80 min of low-intensity wheelchair practice distributed over 3 weeks.

Methods

Seven able-bodied participants performed the pre- and the post-test and 56 min of visual feedback-based low-intensity wheelchair propulsion practice. Kinematics and kinetics of propulsion technique were recorded during the pre- and the post-test. A musculoskeletal model was used to calculate muscle force and glenohumeral reaction force.

Results

Participants decreased push frequency (51 -> 36 pushes/min, p = 0.04) and increased contact angle (68 -> 94 degrees, p = 0.02) between the pre- and the post-test. The excursion of the upper arm increased, approaching significance (297 -> 342 mm, p = 0.06). Range of motion of the hand, trunk and shoulder remained unchanged. The mean glenohumeral reaction force per cycle decreased by 13%, approaching significance (268 -> 232 N, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

Despite homogenous changes in propulsion technique, the kinematic solution to the task varied among the participants. Participants exhibited two glenohumeral reaction force distribution patterns: 1) Two individuals developed high force at the onset of the push, leading to increased peak and mean glenohumeral forces 2) Five individuals distributed the force more evenly over the cycle, lowering both peak and mean glenohumeral forces.

Original languageEnglish
Article number0207291
Number of pages18
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9-Nov-2018

Keywords

  • UPPER EXTREMITY
  • MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY
  • MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL
  • GLENOHUMERAL JOINT
  • MUSCLE
  • HAND
  • IDENTIFICATION
  • IMPINGEMENT
  • PARAPLEGIA
  • CONTACT

Cite this