Changes in the endurance shuttle walk test in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure after pulmonary rehabilitation: the minimal important difference obtained with anchor- and distribution-based method

Wytske A. Altenburg*, Marieke L. Duiverman, Nick H. T. ten Hacken, Huib A. M. Kerstjens, Mathieu H. G. de Greef, Peter J. Wijkstra, Johan B. Wempe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
325 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Although the endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) has proven to be responsive to change in exercise capacity after pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for COPD, the minimally important difference (MID) has not yet been established. We aimed to establish the MID of the ESWT in patients with severe COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure following PR.

Methods: Data were derived from a randomized controlled trial, investigating the value of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation added to PR. Fifty-five patients with stable COPD, GOLD stage IV, with chronic respiratory failure were included (mean (SD) FEV1 31.1 (12.0) % pred, age 62 (9) y). MID estimates of the ESWT in seconds, percentage and meters change were calculated with anchor based and distribution based methods. Six minute walking distance (6MWD), peak work rate on bicycle ergometry (Wpeak) and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) were used as anchors and Cohen's effect size was used as distribution based method.

Results: The estimated MID of the ESWT with the different anchors ranged from 186-199 s, 76-82% and 154-164 m. Using the distribution based method the MID was 144 s, 61% and 137 m.

Conclusions: Estimates of the MID for the ESWT after PR showed only small differences using different anchors in patients with COPD and chronic respiratory failure. Therefore we recommend using a range of 186-199 s, 76-82% or 154-164 m as MID of the ESWT in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. Further research in larger populations should elucidate whether this cut-off value is also valid in other COPD populations and with other interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number27
Number of pages7
JournalRespiratory Research
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19-Feb-2015

Keywords

  • Endurance shuttle walk test
  • Minimally important difference
  • COPD
  • Respiratory failure
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • NOCTURNAL NONINVASIVE VENTILATION
  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • EXERCISE CAPACITY
  • 6-MINUTE WALK
  • HEALTH-STATUS
  • DISEASE
  • RESPONSIVENESS
  • QUESTIONNAIRE
  • STANDARDIZATION

Cite this