Civil Society Organizations: The Site of Legitimizing the Common Good. A literature review

Liv Egholm*, Liesbet Heyse, Damien Mourey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
627 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The concept of legitimacy—i.e., being regarded as “lawful, admissible, and justified” (Edwards in NGO rights and responsibilities: a new deal for global governance, The Foreign Policy Center, London, 2000)—is pivotal within civil society research. Recently, the concept has applied to wider notions concerning the civil sphere and civic action. The introductory article of this special issue aims to provide an overview of conceptualizations of legitimacy within civil society research and to point at new avenues for future research. We depart from Suddaby et al.’s (Acad Manag Ann 11(1):451–478, 2017) configurations of legitimacy within management literature: as property, perception, and process. While these configurations are also reflected in civil society literature, with legitimacy as property being prominent, they do not capture the full scope of civil society literature on legitimacy, given its multidisciplinary nature, its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, and the presence of complementary conceptualizations of legitimacy. We posit that the legitimacy-as-relations-in-processes perspective is valuable for advancing research in civil society organizations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalVOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date10-Oct-2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb-2020

Keywords

  • NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
  • SOCIAL ENTERPRISES
  • RESOURCE DEPENDENCE
  • NGO LEGITIMACY
  • PUBLIC SPHERE
  • ACCOUNTABILITY
  • IMPACT
  • GOVERNANCE
  • DEMOCRACY
  • REPRESENTATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Civil Society Organizations: The Site of Legitimizing the Common Good. A literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this