Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical auditing as an instrument to improve care for patients with ovarian cancer: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA)

  • participants of the Dutch Gynecological Oncology Collaborator Group
  • , N. M.S. Baldewpersad Tewarie*
  • , W. J. van Driel
  • , M. van Ham
  • , M. W. Wouters
  • , R. Kruitwagen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)
    150 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Introduction: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA) was initiated in 2014 to serve as a nationwide audit, which registers the four most prevalent gynecological malignancies. This study presents the first results of clinical auditing for ovarian cancer in the Netherlands.

    Methods: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit is facilitated by the Dutch Institute of Clinical Auditing (DICA) and run by a scientific committee. Items are collected through a web-based registration based on a set of predefined quality indicators. Results of quality indicators are shown, and benchmarked information is given back to the user. Data verification was done in 2016.

    Results: Between January 01, 2014 and December 31, 2018, 6535 patients with ovarian cancer were registered. The case ascertainment was 98.3% in 2016. The number of patients with ovarian cancer who start therapy within 28 days decreased over time from 68.7% in 2014 to 62.7% in 2018 (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with primary cytoreductive surgery decreased over time (57.8%–39.7%, P < 0.001). However, patients with complete primary cytoreductive surgery improved over time (53.5%–69.1%, P < 0.001). Other quality indicators did not significantly change over time.

    Conclusion: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit provides valuable data on the quality of care on patients with ovarian cancer in the Netherlands. Data show variation between hospitals with regard to pre-determined quality indicators. Results of ‘best practices’ will be shared with all participants of the clinical audit with the aim of improving quality of care nationwide.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1691-1697
    Number of pages7
    JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
    Volume47
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul-2021

    Keywords

    • Commission on professional and hospital activities
    • Female
    • Gynecologic neoplasms
    • Health care
    • Quality indicators

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical auditing as an instrument to improve care for patients with ovarian cancer: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this