Clinical Implications of Slope of GFR in Clinical Trials of CKD Progression

  • CKD-EPI Clinical Trials Consortium
  • , Tom Greene
  • , Willem Collier
  • , Benjamin Haaland
  • , Chong Zhang
  • , Sunil V. Badve
  • , Fernando Caravaca-Fontán
  • , Lucia Del Vecchio
  • , Jürgen Floege
  • , Thierry Hannedouche
  • , Enyu Imai
  • , Tazeen H. Jafar
  • , Julia B. Lewis
  • , Philip K.T. Li
  • , Francesco Locatelli
  • , Bart D. Maes
  • , Brendon Neuen
  • , Ronald D. Perrone
  • , Francesco P. Schena
  • , Robert Toto
  • Christoph Wanner, Mark Woodward, Arjan Van Zuilen, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Lesley A. Inker*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Slope of the GFR is considered a validated surrogate endpoint for CKD trials. However, differing short-term and long-term treatment effects on GFR slope can create ambiguities concerning the appropriate period for evaluating slope, in part because current methods cannot separate the distinct contributions of the acute (before 3 months) and chronic (after 3 months) slopes for treatment effects on clinical endpoints (CEs).

Methods: We estimated treatment effects on the acute and chronic GFR slopes and on the established CE of kidney failure or serum creatinine doubling for 66 randomized treatment comparisons from previous CKD clinical trials. We used a novel Bayesian meta-regression framework to relate treatment effects on the established CE to both the acute and chronic slopes in a single multivariable model to determine the independent contributions of the acute and chronic slopes.

Results: Treatment effects on both the acute and chronic slopes independently predicted the treatment effect on the established CE with a high median R2 (95% credible interval) of 0.95 (0.79 to 1.00). For a fixed treatment effect on the chronic slope, each 1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 greater acute GFR decline for the treatment versus control increased the hazard ratio for the established CE by 11.4% (7.9%-15.0%), against the treatment. The optimal weights for the acute and chronic slopes were consistent with the 3-year total slope defined as the average slope extending from baseline to 3 years.

Conclusions: Treatment effects on both the acute and chronic GFR slopes are independent determinants of the effects on the established CE, with variation in acute effects accounting for much of the observed variation in treatment effects on the CE across previous trials. Our results establish that acute effects affect the CE independently of treatment effects on the chronic slope and support the 3-year total slope as the primary slope-based outcome in randomized trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)632-641
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May-2025

Keywords

  • clinical trial
  • GFR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Implications of Slope of GFR in Clinical Trials of CKD Progression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this