@inbook{005f4fe39cfb493187f8803e0e12c395,
title = "Closing the gap?: Twitter as an instrument for connected representation",
abstract = "In this chapter, we present a typology of the tweeting behaviour of candidates as a means of analysing the extent to which politicians are harnessing the potential of social media to actively interact with their constituents. Our research, which included content analysis of tweets (n = 13,637) from all the Conservative and Labour tweeting candidates during the 2010 U.K. General Election, focused on four aspects of tweets: type (normal post, interaction, retweet, retweet with comment); interaction (with, e.g. a politician, journalist, citizen); function (e.g. updating, promoting, advice giving, debating); and topic. Additionally, a qualitative reading on the use of personal tweets was carried out. By examining candidates{\textquoteright} tweeting behaviour, we show that British politicians still mainly use Twitter as a unidirectional form of communication. They are neglecting the possibility this social network offers for, what we call, connected representation.",
keywords = "Election Campaign, UK, Politicians, Twitter, Democratic Representation, Personalization, political parties, RECIPROCITY, INTERACTIVITY, COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, Digital Politics, Digital Democracy, Social Media, New Media and Democracy, Representative Democracy, INTERNET, Internet Politics, E-Democracy, MASS MEDIA, Political journalism, personalisation, Digital Media, MPs, PARLIAMENT, ELECTIONS, British Politics, POLITICS",
author = "Graham, {T. S.} and Broersma, {M. J.} and K. Hazelhoff",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-415-63349-9",
pages = "71 -- 88",
editor = "R. Scullion and R. Gerodimos and D. Jackson and D. Lilleker",
booktitle = "The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment",
publisher = "Routledge",
}