Coaches' and Players' Perceptions of Training Dose: Not a Perfect Match

Michel S. Brink*, Wouter G. P. Frencken, Geir Jordet, Koen A. P. M. Lemmink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate and compare coaches' and players' perceptions of training dose for a full competitive season. Methods: Session rating of perceived exertion (RPE), duration, and training load (session RPE x duration) of 33 professional soccer players (height 178.2 +/- 6.6 cm, weight 70.5 +/- 6.4 kg, percentage body fat 12.2 +/- 1.6) from an under-19 and under-17 (U17) squad were compared with the planned periodization of their professional coaches. Before training, coaches filled in the session rating of intended exertion (RIE) and duration (min) for each player. Players rated session RPE and training duration after each training session. Results: Players perceived their intensity and training load (2446 sessions in total) as significantly harder than what was intended by their coaches (P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-502
Number of pages6
JournalInternational journal of sports physiology and performance
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May-2014

Keywords

  • periodization
  • session RPE
  • training load
  • overtraining
  • football
  • SESSION-RPE METHOD
  • SOCCER PLAYERS
  • OVERTRAINING SYNDROME
  • LOAD
  • SPORT
  • PERFORMANCE
  • PREVENTION
  • RECOVERY
  • VALIDITY
  • QUANTIFY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coaches' and Players' Perceptions of Training Dose: Not a Perfect Match'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this