Comparing Collective and Personal Professional Theories of Experienced Practitioners

Antoine C.M. van den Bogaart*, Marco Mazereeuw, Hans G.K. Hummel, Paul A. Kirschner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A characteristic of being a professional is the internalisation of the collective professional theory (CPT)—the shared insights of professionals. Problems arise when different opinions stemming from professionals’ personal professional theories (PPTs) obscure a CPT’s content. This study argues that cooperating professionals’ CPTs form a so-called field and can be represented by concept maps. The relations between PPTs, CPTs, and fields are examined for the fields of accountancy and teaching. The results indicate that CPTs are more complex than PPTs, and that the teachers’ field is more diverse than the accountants’ field. These insights are important because socialisation in a field may be fostered if one is aware of CPTs and the surrounding field in relation to one’s PPT.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-377
Number of pages15
JournalScandinavian Journal of Educational Research
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Vocational field
  • collective professional theories
  • Personal professional theories
  • concept map

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Collective and Personal Professional Theories of Experienced Practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this