TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing extracellular vesicles and cell membranes as biocompatible coatings for gold nanorods
T2 - Implications for targeted theranostics
AU - Pincela Lins, Paula Maria
AU - Ribovski, Laís
AU - Corsi Antonio, Luana
AU - Altei, Wanessa Fernanda
AU - Sobreiro Selistre-de-Araújo, Heloisa
AU - Cancino-Bernardi, Juliana
AU - Zucolotto, Valtencir
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (Grant numbers 2017/21869-6, 2016/00971-4, 2014/50947-7 and 2020/00124-5) and by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (project number 309943/2020-5 and 442690/2020-7). The authors thank LME/LNNano for technical support during the electron microscopy.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell membrane nanoghosts are excellent coatings for nanomaterials, providing enhanced delivery in the target sites and evasion of the immune system. These cell-derived coatings allow the exploration of the delivery properties of the nanoparticles without stimulation of the immune system. Despite the advances reported on the use of EVs and cell-membrane coatings for nanomedicine applications, there are no standards to compare the benefits and main differences between these technologies. Here we investigated macrophage-derived EVs and cell membranes-coated gold nanorods and compared both systems in terms of target delivery in cancer and stromal cells. Our results reveal a higher tendency of EV-coated nanorods to interact with macrophages yet both EV and cell membrane-coated nanorods were internalized in the metastatic breast cancer cells. The main differences between these nanoparticles are related to the presence or absence of CD47 in the coating material, not usually addressed in EVs characterization. Our findings highlight important delivery differences exhibited by EVs- or cell membranes- coated nanorods which understanding may be important to the design and development of theragnostic nanomaterials using these coatings for target delivery.
AB - Extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell membrane nanoghosts are excellent coatings for nanomaterials, providing enhanced delivery in the target sites and evasion of the immune system. These cell-derived coatings allow the exploration of the delivery properties of the nanoparticles without stimulation of the immune system. Despite the advances reported on the use of EVs and cell-membrane coatings for nanomedicine applications, there are no standards to compare the benefits and main differences between these technologies. Here we investigated macrophage-derived EVs and cell membranes-coated gold nanorods and compared both systems in terms of target delivery in cancer and stromal cells. Our results reveal a higher tendency of EV-coated nanorods to interact with macrophages yet both EV and cell membrane-coated nanorods were internalized in the metastatic breast cancer cells. The main differences between these nanoparticles are related to the presence or absence of CD47 in the coating material, not usually addressed in EVs characterization. Our findings highlight important delivery differences exhibited by EVs- or cell membranes- coated nanorods which understanding may be important to the design and development of theragnostic nanomaterials using these coatings for target delivery.
KW - Cell membrane
KW - Extracellular vesicles
KW - Gold nanorods
KW - Macrophages
KW - Tumor microenvironment
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.05.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.05.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 35643369
AN - SCOPUS:85131657042
SN - 0935-1221
VL - 176
SP - 168
EP - 179
JO - European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
JF - European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
ER -