Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing Two Methods for Adding Enhanced Dependencies to UD Treebanks

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

    Abstract

    When adding enhanced dependencies to an existing UD treebank, one can opt for heuristics that predict the enhanced dependencies on the basis of the UD annotation only. If the treebank is the result of conversion from an underlying treebank, an alternative is to produce the enhanced dependencies directly on the basis of this underlying annotation. Here we present a method for doing the latter for the Dutch UD treebanks. We compare our method with the UD -based approach of Schuster et al. (2018). While there are a number of systematic differences in the output of both methods, it appears these are the result of insufficient detail in the annotation guidelines and it is not the case that one approach is superior over the other in principle.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages17-30
    Number of pages14
    Publication statusPublished - 13-Dec-2018
    EventProceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories - University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
    Duration: 13-Dec-201814-Dec-2018

    Conference

    ConferenceProceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories
    Abbreviated titleTLT 2018
    Country/TerritoryNorway
    CityOslo
    Period13/12/201814/12/2018

    Keywords

    • universal dependencies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Two Methods for Adding Enhanced Dependencies to UD Treebanks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this