TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of acute and subacute genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events of radiotherapy for prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, permanent implant brachytherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy
AU - Morimoto, Masahiro
AU - Yoshioka, Yasuo
AU - Konishi, Koji
AU - Isohashi, Fumiaki
AU - Takahashi, Yutaka
AU - Ogata, Toshiyuki
AU - Koizumi, Masahiko
AU - Teshima, Teruki
AU - Bijl, Henk P
AU - van der Schaaf, Arjen
AU - Langendijk, Johannes A
AU - Ogawa, Kazuhiko
PY - 2014/7/31
Y1 - 2014/7/31
N2 - AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To examine acute and subacute urinary and rectal toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer monotherapeutically treated with the following four radiotherapeutic techniques: intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, low-dose-rate permanent implant brachytherapy using I-125 seeds, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy.METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients with localized prostate cancer were distributed as follows: 57 underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy, 35 underwent three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 37 underwent I-125 implant, and 27 underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The prescribed doses were 70-74 Gy/35-37 fractions, 70 Gy/35 fractions, 145 Gy, and 45.5 Gy/7 fraction/4 days for intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, I-125 implant, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy, respectively. Toxicities (≤6 months) were retrospectively evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.RESULTS: The frequency of grade 1 or 2 urinary toxicities using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (33/35, 94%) was significantly higher than that with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (18/27, 67%) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (37/57, 65%) (P <0.05). The frequency of grade 1 or 2 urinary toxicities using I-125 implant was 31/37, 84%. The frequency of grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal toxicities using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (17/35, 49%) was significantly higher than that using I-125 implant (4/37, 11%) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (0/27, 0%) (P <0.05). Using intensity-modulated radiation therapy, the frequency of grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal toxicities was 18/57 (32%), which was significantly higher than that using high-dose-rate brachytherapy (0/27, 0%) (P <0.05). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were not observed.CONCLUSIONS: Acute and subacute genitourinary toxicities were observed more frequently after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy than after high-dose-rate brachytherapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Acute and subacute gastrointestinal toxicities were seen more often after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy than after brachytherapy (I-125 implant or high-dose-rate brachytherapy).
AB - AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To examine acute and subacute urinary and rectal toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer monotherapeutically treated with the following four radiotherapeutic techniques: intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, low-dose-rate permanent implant brachytherapy using I-125 seeds, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy.METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients with localized prostate cancer were distributed as follows: 57 underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy, 35 underwent three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 37 underwent I-125 implant, and 27 underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The prescribed doses were 70-74 Gy/35-37 fractions, 70 Gy/35 fractions, 145 Gy, and 45.5 Gy/7 fraction/4 days for intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, I-125 implant, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy, respectively. Toxicities (≤6 months) were retrospectively evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.RESULTS: The frequency of grade 1 or 2 urinary toxicities using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (33/35, 94%) was significantly higher than that with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (18/27, 67%) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (37/57, 65%) (P <0.05). The frequency of grade 1 or 2 urinary toxicities using I-125 implant was 31/37, 84%. The frequency of grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal toxicities using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (17/35, 49%) was significantly higher than that using I-125 implant (4/37, 11%) or high-dose-rate brachytherapy (0/27, 0%) (P <0.05). Using intensity-modulated radiation therapy, the frequency of grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal toxicities was 18/57 (32%), which was significantly higher than that using high-dose-rate brachytherapy (0/27, 0%) (P <0.05). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were not observed.CONCLUSIONS: Acute and subacute genitourinary toxicities were observed more frequently after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy than after high-dose-rate brachytherapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Acute and subacute gastrointestinal toxicities were seen more often after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy than after brachytherapy (I-125 implant or high-dose-rate brachytherapy).
KW - acute and subacute toxicity
KW - prostate cancer
KW - radiotherapy
KW - MONOTHERAPY
KW - TOXICITY
U2 - 10.1700/1578.17198
DO - 10.1700/1578.17198
M3 - Article
C2 - 25076236
SN - 0300-8916
VL - 100
SP - 265
EP - 271
JO - Tumori
JF - Tumori
IS - 3
ER -