Comparison of the suitability of CBCT- and MR-based synthetic CTs for daily adaptive proton therapy in head and neck patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)- and magnetic resonance (MR)-images allow a daily observation of patient anatomy but are not directly suited for accurate proton dose calculations. This can be overcome by creating synthetic CTs (sCT) using deep convolutional neural networks. In this study, we compared sCTs based on CBCTs and MRs for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients in terms of image quality and proton dose calculation accuracy.

A dataset of 27 H&N-patients, treated with proton therapy (PT), containing planning CTs (pCTs), repeat CTs, CBCTs and MRs were used to train two neural networks to convert either CBCTs or MRs into sCTs. Image quality was quantified by calculating mean absolute error (MAE), mean error (ME) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for bones. The dose evaluation consisted of a systematic non-clinical analysis and a clinical recalculation of actually used proton treatment plans. Gamma analysis was performed for non-clinical and clinical treatment plans. For clinical treatment plans also dose to targets and organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were compared.

CBCT-based sCTs resulted in higher image quality with an average MAE of 40 +/- 4 HU and a DSC of 0.95, while for MR-based sCTs a MAE of 65 +/- 4 HU and a DSC of 0.89 was observed. Also in clinical proton dose calculations, sCT(CBCT) achieved higher average gamma pass ratios (2%/2 mm criteria) than sCT(MR) (96.1% vs. 93.3%). Dose-volume histograms for selected OARs and NTCP-values showed a very small difference between sCT(CBCT) and sCT(MR) and a high agreement with the reference pCT.

CBCT- and MR-based sCTs have the potential to enable accurate proton dose calculations valuable for daily adaptive PT. Significant image quality differences were observed but did not affect proton dose calculation accuracy in a similar manner. Especially the recalculation of clinical treatment plans showed high agreement with the pCT for both sCT(CBCT) and sCT(MR.)

Original languageEnglish
Article number235036
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume65
Issue number23
Early online date24-Aug-2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7-Dec-2020

Keywords

  • adaptive proton therapy
  • NTCP-evaluation
  • CBCT-based synthetic CT
  • MR-based synthetic CT
  • neural network
  • DOSE CALCULATION
  • COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
  • IMAGE REGISTRATION
  • RADIOTHERAPY
  • FEASIBILITY
  • BRAIN
  • ACCURACY
  • NETWORK
  • TOOL

Cite this