Competence remains competence? Reopening decisions that violate Community Law

J.H. Jans; A.T. Marseille

Competence remains competence? Reopening decisions that violate Community Law

J.H. Jans, A.T. Marseille

Faculty of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic

314 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper discusses the question what should administrative bodies do in cases where they have adopted decisions that turn out to be contrary to Community law, but these decisions have become final because the parties concerned have not made use of the possibilities of judicial review available to them.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	75-86
Number of pages	12
Journal	Review of European Administrative Law
Publication status	Published - 2007

Keywords

european law
administrative law
europees recht
bestuursrecht
86.86
86.55

Access to Document

jans_marseille_vol_0_realaw.pdfFinal publisher's version, 107 KB

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{674f2bef0bc143c9a8c84c83e0fe6db6,

title = "Competence remains competence? Reopening decisions that violate Community Law",

abstract = "This paper discusses the question what should administrative bodies do in cases where they have adopted decisions that turn out to be contrary to Community law, but these decisions have become final because the parties concerned have not made use of the possibilities of judicial review available to them.",

keywords = "european law, administrative law, europees recht, bestuursrecht, 86.86, 86.55",

author = "J.H. Jans and A.T. Marseille",

note = "Relation: http://www.rug.nl/Rechten/ date_submitted:2000 Rights: University of Groningen. Faculty of Law",

year = "2007",

language = "English",

pages = "75--86",

journal = "Review of European Administrative Law",

issn = "1874-7973",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competence remains competence? Reopening decisions that violate Community Law

AU - Jans, J.H.

AU - Marseille, A.T.

N1 - Relation: http://www.rug.nl/Rechten/ date_submitted:2000 Rights: University of Groningen. Faculty of Law

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper discusses the question what should administrative bodies do in cases where they have adopted decisions that turn out to be contrary to Community law, but these decisions have become final because the parties concerned have not made use of the possibilities of judicial review available to them.

AB - This paper discusses the question what should administrative bodies do in cases where they have adopted decisions that turn out to be contrary to Community law, but these decisions have become final because the parties concerned have not made use of the possibilities of judicial review available to them.

KW - european law

KW - administrative law

KW - europees recht

KW - bestuursrecht

KW - 86.86

KW - 86.55

M3 - Article

SN - 1874-7973

SP - 75

EP - 86

JO - Review of European Administrative Law

JF - Review of European Administrative Law

ER -