@inbook{b0c31ba901544c40939cfd2ae6bd9d6c,
title = "Connection premises: Their character, criticism, and defence",
abstract = "By presenting an argument, a proponent commits himself or herself to the adequacy of the connection between the argument{\textquoteright}s premises and its conclusion. What is this connection, and when is it adequate? I deal with these questions by using insights and techniques from dialectical approaches to argumentation. First, I show that by advancing an argument, the proponent commits himself or herself to its connection proposition, which does not generalize upon the conclusion and premises. When a challenge turns this connection proposition into a connection premise, there may be a particularist defence available, so that the proponent need not commit himself or herself to any generalization of it. Second, I pay attention to situations where the proponent does choose to support the connection premise by means of a general argumentation scheme, showing there to be a variety of ways to justify that scheme. ",
author = "{van Laar}, Jan",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1075/aic.10.03van",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789027211279",
series = "Argumentation in Context",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishers",
pages = "39--55",
editor = "Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone",
booktitle = "Argumentation across Communities of Practice",
}