Conscience as a Regulatory Function: An Integrative Theory Put to the Test

Marion Verkade*, Julie Karsten, Frans Koenraadt, Frans Schalkwijk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
382 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The subject of this study is an integrative theory of the conscience. According to this theory, conscience is operationalised as a regulatory function of one's own behaviour and identity, resulting from an interplay of empathy, self-conscious emotions such as guilt and shame, and moral reasoning. This study aimed to evaluate conscience in an adult forensic psychiatric sample by assessing the underlying factors proposed by Schalkwijk. Offenders (n = 48) appeared to show less affective but not less cognitive empathy, less identification with others, less personal distress in seeing others' suffering, less shame and shame-proneness, and lower levels of moral reasoning than non-offenders (n = 50). In coping with self-conscious emotions, offenders used the same amount of externalising coping strategies, but fewer internalising coping strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-395
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Volume64
Issue number4
Early online date14-Oct-2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar-2020

Keywords

  • conscience
  • empathy
  • guilt
  • shame
  • moral reasoning
  • offenders
  • delinquency
  • SERVING COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS
  • SELF-CONSCIOUS AFFECT
  • INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
  • HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE
  • EMPATHY
  • GUILT
  • SHAME
  • VALIDATION
  • PRISONERS
  • EMOTIONS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conscience as a Regulatory Function: An Integrative Theory Put to the Test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this